Chevy Bolt Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Range
Class motion alleges 2017, 2018 and 2019 Chevy Bolt batteries can’t be absolutely charged.


A Chevy Bolt class motion lawsuit alleges house owners and lessees aren’t receiving the vary they paid for as a result of Common Motors will not enable clients to completely cost the batteries.

In keeping with the lawsuit, GM allegedly hid widespread defects within the 60 kWh 350V lithium-ion batteries that trigger the Bolt vehicles to catch fireplace.

The Chevy Bolt class motion lawsuit contains all U.S. house owners and lessees of 2017-2019 Bolts.

In keeping with the Bolt lawsuit, drivers started to have issues with the 2017 Chevrolet Bolt batteries, allegedly together with the sudden incapability to speed up. The plaintiff says GM introduced a buyer satisfaction program for sure 2017 Bolts due to battery cells with low voltage ranges.

The automaker mentioned it could substitute the battery packs within the affected 2017 Bolts, however the plaintiff says nothing was completed about 2018-2019 fashions.

“GM didn’t handle any attainable widespread challenge with the Faulty Battery, and handled affected automobiles as individualized manufacturing errors or defects. Nevertheless, there was a extra insidious and widespread drawback.” – Chevy Bolt class motion lawsuit

The GM proprietor who sued claims the high-voltage battery can overheat when it is practically or absolutely charged, an issue GM remains to be looking for a technique to repair.

The Bolt lawsuit references a November 2020 Chevy Bolt recall for practically 51,000 Bolt EV vehicles worldwide following at the least 5 fires and two accidents. However the plaintiff claims GM waited years to challenge the recall, then when it did announce the recall there have been no repairs to forestall the vehicles from catching fireplace.

Homeowners of 2017-2019 Chevrolet Bolts have been instructed to park exterior, at the least till the recalled electrical vehicles are mounted.

Nevertheless, the category motion lawsuit alleges the interim repair provided by GM solely reprograms the Bolts to cost the batteries as much as 90% capability.

The plaintiff says this implies house owners and lessees don’t get the identical journey vary as marketed, and Bolt drivers should cost the batteries extra usually than marketed due to the diminished battery vary.

The Bolt class motion additionally alleges the vehicles have misplaced worth as a result of GM cannot correctly restore the automobiles.

The Chevy Bolt class motion lawsuit was filed within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Japanese District of Michigan: Shawn Walker, v. Common Motors LLC.

The plaintiff is represented by Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Markovits, and Inventory & DeMarco, LLC.