Honda CR-V Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed
A Honda cracked windshield despatched the proprietor to court docket after Honda refused to pay for the injury.


A Honda CR-V class motion lawsuit has been dismissed after the plaintiff accused the automaker of promoting SUVs with faulty windshields that spontaneously crack.

In accordance with the 2017-2019 Honda CR-V lawsuit, the windshields may even shatter, and all with none exterior objects hitting the glass.

Illinois plaintiff Hakeem Hasan filed the lawsuit claiming he parked his new 2018 Honda CR-V in a car parking zone and located a big crack within the glass the following morning.

A Honda dealership carried out exams and allegedly decided the windshield crack wasn’t attributable to something hitting the glass. Allegedly the guarantee administrator mentioned the crack appeared prefer it was attributable to stress on account of faulty supplies or building.

Nevertheless, the Honda vendor service supervisor allegedly would not even have a look at the cracked windshield and Honda refused to pay for repairs though the CR-V had lower than 5,000 miles on it.

The CR-V class action lawsuit says the plaintiff took his SUV to an auto glass restore firm which additionally allegedly discovered the crack did not come from an influence.

The restore store mentioned the proof was “indicating a standard car body subject which exerts extreme stress on the windshield’s edges, inflicting stress cracks.” The Honda dealership was allegedly notified concerning the discovering however nonetheless refused to pay for the windshield.

The CR-V class motion alleges one of many large issues with a cracked windshield is the way it impacts the Honda Sensing characteristic which makes use of sensors, cameras and radar to make driving safer. In accordance with the CR-V class motion lawsuit, a busted windshield may cause critical issues with the Sensing system.

“[S]cratches, nicks, and different injury to the windshield throughout the digicam’s sight view may cause the system to function abnormally. If this happens, we advocate that you just exchange the windshield with a real Honda substitute windshield.” – Honda CR-V proprietor’s handbook

The Honda CR-V class motion lawsuit was dismissed after the plaintiff and Honda agreed to settle the case on a person foundation.

“IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Hakeem Hasan and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., by way of their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that this motion is dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff’s particular person claims, with every Occasion to bear his or its personal prices. This motion is dismissed with out prejudice as to the claims of the members of the putative class apart from Plaintiff.”

The Honda CR-V class motion lawsuit was filed within the U.S. District Court docket for the Northern District of Illinois, Jap Division – Hasan, v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

The plaintiff is represented by McGuire Regulation.